When I picked this query for this week’s Query Wednesday, the author asked if she could send the newer version instead. I thought that was perfect. You know what that means? We get a chance to compare two queries for the same manuscript!
Here is the first version of Nicole’s query:
Dear Agent:
God answers nearly all of fifteen-year-old Crystal’s prayers, but her relation with Him is tested when she finds a note for her dead mother and learns her birth wasn’t natural. Her mother had sought out the help of witches to conceive a child. Crystal tracks down the witches who tell her that she is the human incarnation of magic and that she had been the one to answer her prayers, not God.
As Crystal struggles to learn who she is and what she can become, she is thrust into the middle of a centuries old war between witches and shaman. If Crystal can’t learn to control herself, and her magic, she just might start the Apocalypse and doom the entire world.
CRYSTAL’S MAGIC is a 80,000-word YA paranormal novel with series potential.
I am the author of a fantasy romance trilogy, Kingdom of Arnhem – Woman of Honor (2009), Knight of Glory (2010), and Champion of Valor (2011) published with Desert Breeze Publishing. Fourteen of my short works have appeared in various anthologies, including Mertales by Wyvern Publications, and many collections by Pill Hill Press, with one more to be published later on this year.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Nicole Zoltack
It’s a nice query, Nicole. Now, here is the second version:
Dear Ms. Lessa,
Fifteen-year-old Crystal believes in the power of God, not magic, so
when time slows down so she doesn’t miss the bus (again) or speeds up
so she can avoid answering questions in class, she thinks He’s
answering her prayers. But after she discovers a note detailing how
her now dead mother sought the help of witches to conceive her,
Crystal’s faith becomes one giant question mark. Seems magic may have
played a bigger role in her life, after all. Wanting answers, Crystal
tracks down the witches, who tell her she is the human incarnation of
magic—the only person whose magical potential is limitless.
Crystal struggles to learn who she is and what she can become while
learning how to fly and playing with magical fire. Her life spirals
out of control—a witch hunter is after her, and shamans and witches
want to use her to end a centuries-old war between the two magical
races. Then the witch hunter captures her boyfriend, and shamans her
aunt and other friends.
Unable to restrain her swirling emotions, Crystal’s magic goes
haywire. If she can’t learn to control her powers, forget about ending
the war—she just might start the Apocalypse. As if destroying the
world isn’t enough pressure, Crystal’s faith in God isn’t the only the
thing being tested. She has to believe in herself or the entire world
is doomed.
So, which one works best? Right now, each of them has its strengths. But the main issue in both of them is the lack of a voice. And voice in a query is essential. Here are some suggestions to fix that.
When you’re starting a query, it’s always good to have a punchline, a sentence that shows the strength of your plot and your voice. Right now, both queries start with longer paragraphs that go straight into telling the plot. That’s not as eye catching. But the first part of the first query’s first sentence (boy, that’s a lot of firsts) could make a strong punchline. “God answers nearly all of fifteen-year-old Crystal’s prayers.” Perfect! You got yourself an opener!
But the complement doesn’t work. It’s too much telling. What would work as a nice follow-up to that punchline? The examples on the second query. If rewritten, they can really show voice and bring the reader in. So a good follow-up to that first sentence might be: “At least that’s the way it seems. How else would she explain time slowing down so she doesn’t miss the bus?” That should be done in your own voice, of course, not mine (and no, don’t worry, I won’t rewrite the whole thing). But the point is, it becomes catchier when you shorten sentences and give them voice.
Then you go into the summary. In the first query, it’s too short, too summarized. But in the second, it’s a little too long. Authors should aim for two paragraphs that highlight the plot and the main conflicts. We don’t need a step by step, we need something that will hook the agent. So keep it simple and with voice. Examples are always good to humanize the character.
Then just add the basic info (title, genre, wordcount) and author credentials, like in the first query, and you’re done! When you have two versions, mixing and matching might be the best way to go.
Questions?
Remember, if you want to have your query analyzed, send it to gabrielalessacarvalho@gmail.com with the subject line QUERY WEDNESDAY. Not every query will get published here, but hopefully the ones that do will help everyone!
Thank you for your query, Nicole!
Great advice! I think your suggestions really create a stronger query letter for the reader.
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful comments! *rushes off to incorporate changes*
Thank you for all the advice and help you offer to writers.
This is great advice–though I already knew you were a ton of help with queries.
The part about enhancing the voice was especially helpful. I can’t seem to get enough examples of that.
I’ll make sure I address voice more often then! It really can be a tricky issue.
I think the strengths and weaknesses are really summed up well.
I was more hooked by the first query than the second, but by itself, the first one seemed a bit too vague. And in the first query the main conflict seems external–a conflict of war and the Apocalypse. The second leans more toward an internal character struggle regarding faith and self-confidence.
My thoughts exactly! Which reminds me: it’s always good to get people to read your query and ask them what they think it’s about. From the two queries, I imagined different plots too.
Really good analysis–especially since you could compare two versions of a query for the same book. It’s interesting to see how differently you can pitch the same material.
Nice critique, and hi Nicole *waves:)